Let me critique this persons work

First of all no I'm no proffessional, however I did take an art history and some art classes and I've been taking a good look around this persons account and read a few things, and I have to say.
Yes, you are a pedophile when you can't draw anything else for a long time
2: If your goal is to remove a government agency bent on removing pedophiles that does raise a red flag here, I'm sorry but that does make you a highly suspicious person for pedophilia period, if you weren't one you would not have an issue with this company.
now the user I am doing is who happens to draw naked little girls and boys which may I add.... is disturbing and will be critiquing one of her images.
Here we go lets see what we have to work with.

Uh..... okay.... you call this art? I'm going hard on you for good reason, you can't seem to understand this is wrong first off.
And I see why
This ain't nude art, second.... is she a little girl? O~O So, you gave a leaf, to the mouse.... but nothing to the girl? Do you realize in the bible even Eve was given a leaf to help cover herself? And I think even children?

Okay going to say it outright,
In art history you learn that the ONLY time children are shown nude are when they are bathing, when they are shown to show the tragedies of war, and are NEVER shown nude from the waist down >~< all cultures does not matter what it is, share this concept.
and here you are, showing a little girl, for nude sake obviously older than an infant nude just standing there, blushing no less.
Its humiliating and wrong in so many senses, and the fact you gave a leaf to the MOUSE and not the girl, makes me think something very perverted is going on. I'm not joking who would not think something perverted is going on in this picture, if you presented this to your art teacher, he'd not only get disturbed, he'd request first, you'd redo the assignment (whatever it is) and if you failed or repeated this he'd give you an F, someone in my class asked the teacher about nudity and its levels.
In sex it is never presentable for kids, in adults for art, even in porn (teachers word) Its supposed to represent something.
I do not understand in any shape or form what this image is supposed to mean other than, the girl is the mouse's slave as slaves were traditionally presented as nude!
Is that what your trying to show? The girl is the mouses slave is that why he has a leaf and she has nothing except some necklace and a bow? I'm not joking, this is not nudist art.
My own nude art does not do this, my characters are doing poses and laid out in respective styles, this, I'm sorry. This is not art.
Lets see another piece of art. >~< I'm done with this image by the way in artistic style yours BARELY comes close to being called Expressionism.
Which.... by the way.... Expressionism

Um...... again why is the girl not wearing any clothes, and only the boy is >~< This is why everyone thinks your a pedophile for girls.
Because the little girl is again not wearing anything. Its getting sick okay, look your linework is very sloppy, color could use a lot more shading,
I really can't believe I'm going to do this but I have to.... for the kids.... dear lord..... you need to do a lot better if you want to be an artist. >~<
Look at the clothe on the boy for example it should be flowing a lot better and the girl.... Oh god okay you need a LOT of work on the hands children hands are small and their fingers are like nubs. And from how close you have them to the picture you ought to be able to see the fingers at least hold each other.
Their eyes look bad, sorry have to say it, their not at all on level with each other. I understand how her hair is supposed to go and so does his hair I can't get curly to work anyways so no comment on hair, I'm not the best.
Also background, seriously, that fire does look good I like the smoke technique I'm just REALLY trying to get away from what I'm seeing in the middle seriously you need to stop drawing little girls if you want people to stop thinking your a pedophile, just stating the obvious.
I have no idea what that dark thing in the back is other than a cave entrance? Need to work on it, maybe give it depth, so people know its a cave entrance!
The corners.... eh somewhat good still you should use the liniard I forget what its called system to help make the cavern they are in LOOK like a cavern.

Lets move onto an image that is NOT related to little girls. (because all the images that do feature nudity involve little girls and its way too disturbing!)
ALRIGHT!!! Something more my style...... and yet its no better.
Your style looks like mine did when I started out when it comes to the horse so you need a lot of work however good tip is that the hooves is half a circle try working with that.
Um... I don't get why he's got no arms, it looks like that, please work on drawing hands a good tip is look at your own hand and try drawing it.
Um... have no idea what the yellow thing is, from your poem I take it its supposed to be the castle.
Another good tip is try drawing shapes. (don't ask why I'm willing to help its a critique)
Your tail and the horses hair again I think you need some work.
City in the background, needs work.
Your horse's expression by the way.. if your poem is about love... which I don't get, it seems your poem... I'm not sure what to say other than.. your proving you have a fetish for evil people in mini-skirts and wow, I am so not getting this.

Look just seriously, your nude art ain't art, I cannot believe I critiqued this, but from what everone was saying I needed to prove how this was going.
So I just took some of your images and critiqued them.
Honestly though, the way you act makes you suspicious, I'd think about how I react, and personally your nude art, ain't art.
I know I went hard but hey there you go.
You act suspicious you get it
This will be the final journal for the day and that is it.